I don't see any problem with that.
Let's make a similar change then also in ReusableMessageFactory.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 2016/06/03, at 19:49, Mikael Ståldal <mikael.stal...@magine.com> wrote:
>
> Would it make sense if AbstractMessageFactory was changed so that this method:
> @Override
> public Message newMessage(final Object message) {
> return new ObjectMessage(message);
> }
> did this:
> @Override
> public Message newMessage(final Object message) {
> if (message instanceof CharSequence) {
> return new SimpleMessage((CharSequence) message)
> } else {
> return new ObjectMessage(message);
> }
> }
>
> --
>
>
> Mikael Ståldal
> Senior software developer
>
> Magine TV
> mikael.stal...@magine.com
> Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com
>
> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this message.
> If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not
> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.
>
