Well, the highest number RC would normally be the release, and we haven't skipped any releases, right?
On 8 June 2016 at 00:28, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > We should. If a RC does NOT lead to a release, then how can you tell that > from one that did? > > Gary > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > wrote: > >> Yes. To be honest I haven’t tagged any of the releases since I started >> tagging them as release candidates. The rc1 tag is what was voted on and >> released. >> >> Ralph >> >> >> On Jun 7, 2016, at 7:43 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I was trying to compare sources while investigating a Clirr issue and I >> see that there is no Git tag for 2.6. I take it 2.6 is the same as RC1, >> right? >> >> Gary >> >> -- >> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >> >> >> > > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
