[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15322176#comment-15322176
]
Mikael Ståldal commented on LOG4J2-1397:
----------------------------------------
I think we should either do this properly, or not at all.
I don't see the point in just adding a {{ByteBufferLayout}} to log4j-core,
since that will be a half-baked solution. Users of Log4j can use their own
{{ByteBufferLayout}} if they really want to.
> Support ByteBufferLayout
> ------------------------
>
> Key: LOG4J2-1397
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1397
> Project: Log4j 2
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Layouts
> Affects Versions: 2.6
> Reporter: Remko Popma
>
> As requested by Kirk Pepperdine on the Mechanical Sympathy [mailing
> list|https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mechanical-sympathy/klefjRqlpQE/-1WF59IGAwAJ]:
> Support a new Layout that takes ObjectMessages containing a ByteBuffer
> payload and write them to the appender without modification.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
