I have no idea when we would need or want to do 3.0

Sent from my iPad

> On Jun 30, 2016, at 1:32 AM, Mikael Ståldal <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Are we planning to release Log4j 3.0 soon?
> 
>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> Actually, what I would like to do is drop the 1.x site off the logging page 
>> and just add a link to it from the new log4j page, similar to what 
>> http://hc.apache.org does with commons logging. In fact, we really should 
>> have a link to the log4j 2.3 web site (all the sites for past releases are 
>> still there if you know how to navigate to them) since it was the last log4j 
>> 2 release to support Java 6. I’d like to do the 2.6.2 release by the 4th so 
>> I don’t know if there will be time to fix all of that before then.
>> 
>> Ralph
>> 
>>> On Jun 29, 2016, at 3:22 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I think we can drop the "2" branding from the site as well. We could also 
>>> put a stronger emphasis on the version site as "1.x" but a banner pointing 
>>> to 2.x. Perhaps not a strong as the Jakarta red banner but something like: 
>>> "For the current version of Log4j, please click here"
>>> 
>>> Gary
>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Paul Benedict <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> Regarding 3.0, I think it's going to be a bit of an image problem to get 
>>>> there -- a little uphill battle. Right now the entire website is branded 
>>>> as a "2" site.... to separate it from the decades long fandom of the 1.x 
>>>> site. I am not blaming anyone for that decision. It was necessary to 
>>>> differentiate 2.x from 1.x....
>>>> 
>>>> But it does paint the project a bit into the corner going forward. IMO, 
>>>> you wouldn't want 3.x to be so completely different in its documentation, 
>>>> would you? Even right now, if you go to the site, it really is "Apache 
>>>> Log4j 2" and not simply "Apache Log4j" in the page. Do you see what I am 
>>>> trying to say?
>>>> 
>>>> I know this is unsolicited advice, but I just want to throw my opinion out 
>>>> there to help planning the future. Before you guys try 3.0, take some time 
>>>> to eliminate the hard barrier between 1.x/2.x in your website. Make it 
>>>> just one so that 3.x documentation naturally fits in.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Paul
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] 
>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition
>>> Spring Batch in Action
>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com 
>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
>  
> 
> Mikael Ståldal
> Senior software developer 
> 
> Magine TV
> [email protected]    
> Grev Turegatan 3  | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden  |   www.magine.com 
> 
> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this message. 
> If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not 
> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, 
> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.  
>  

Reply via email to