I haven't seen pack200 fail before. Who uses pack200 anyways? On 2 July 2016 at 08:58, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote:
> Our old friends > > Failed Testsorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core > <https://builds.apache.org/job/Log4j%202.x/2082/org.apache.logging.log4j$log4j-core/testReport> > Test Name <https://builds.apache.org/job/Log4j%202.x/2082/testReport/#> > Duration <https://builds.apache.org/job/Log4j%202.x/2082/testReport/#> Age > <https://builds.apache.org/job/Log4j%202.x/2082/testReport/#> > > org.apache.logging.log4j.core.appender.rolling.RollingAppenderSizeTest.testAppender[log4j-rolling-bzip2.xml > → .bz2] > <https://builds.apache.org/job/Log4j%202.x/2082/org.apache.logging.log4j$log4j-core/testReport/org.apache.logging.log4j.core.appender.rolling/RollingAppenderSizeTest/testAppender_log4j_rolling_bzip2_xml____bz2_/> > 0.35 > sec 1 > > org.apache.logging.log4j.core.appender.rolling.RollingAppenderSizeTest.testAppender[log4j-rolling-pack200.xml > → .pack200] > <https://builds.apache.org/job/Log4j%202.x/2082/org.apache.logging.log4j$log4j-core/testReport/org.apache.logging.log4j.core.appender.rolling/RollingAppenderSizeTest/testAppender_log4j_rolling_pack200_xml____pack200_/> > 0.33 > sec 1 > > On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 10:03 PM, Apache Jenkins Server < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> See <https://builds.apache.org/job/Log4j%202.x/2082/changes> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > -- Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
