Hi, In support scenarios, I often need to point users to the docs for the version they happen to be using in order for them to configure logging just so, which is rarely going to be one we list under Legacy.
I can't just say look at the Log4j web site and pray that the version you are using provides the features shown in the latest docs. We could have a Legacy page with links to all the sites instead of menu items for each versions. Gary On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > Why? Log4j 2.3 is significant as it is the last release to support Java 6 > and Log4j 1.2 is, of course, the last (and only) link to log4j 1. If we > link to all then we would have 20 links there and it wouldn’t be obvious > that log4j 2.3 was the last to support Java 6. > > Ralph > > On Aug 18, 2016, at 11:33 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi All: > > I think the Legacy section of the site should link to all Log4j versions. > > 2c, > Gary > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > > -- E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
