Because Map has a lot more methods that weren’t needed and I didn’t want to implement?
Ralph > On Aug 20, 2016, at 10:16 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi All: > > Now that we have ThreadContextMap2: > > Why don't we do ThreadContextMap2 extends Map<String, String>? > > Why did ThreadContextMap initially not extends Map<String, String>? > > Gary > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com <http://garygregory.wordpress.com/> > Home: http://garygregory.com/ <http://garygregory.com/> > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory <http://twitter.com/GaryGregory>
