It is better than before because there one less "caused by" level.
Gary On Sep 1, 2016 8:28 PM, "Remko Popma" <[email protected]> wrote: > Does that preserve the original stacktrace? > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 2016/09/02, at 6:06, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If it's just to rethrow a checked exception, it should use >> Throwables.rethrow(Throwable t). No exception wrapping is done in that >> method anymore thanks to an abuse of generics I found a couple months ago, >> so the stacktrace looks better. >> > > Done in Git master. > > Gary > > >> >> On 31 August 2016 at 11:29, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> We've got a few of these... not good. Surely there is a better exception >>> checked or not we can use. >>> >>> Gary >>> >>> -- >>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >> > > > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > >
