Nice! Tell me if there is anything I can do to help out. On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 5:07 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We've established that this will need to be released before we can > officially remove the equivalent modules from the main log4j repository > (and release cycle). Since the artifacts are no longer tied directly to > log4j-api/core, we've also agreed that it makes sense to version it > separately as well. The latest releases are 2.8.1, so the next version > number proposed is 11.0. I dig the Spinal Tap reference, so let's go for it. > > I know that the source and binary distributions assemblies need to be > ported over in order to properly create a release candidate. The site is > pretty bare bones, and Ralph has mentioned that he should be able to take > care of integrating it into the main site. Otherwise, I'll be ready to > start a release candidate hopefully by this weekend. > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > -- [image: MagineTV] *Mikael Ståldal* Senior software developer *Magine TV* mikael.stal...@magine.com Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.
