At 16:36 06.02.2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Yes. It will be a problem. Use SocketAppender(s)/SocketServer or
>JMSAppender(s)/JMSSink instead. Ceki
>
>How about a situation where 1 or more instances of multiple objects are
>running within a single JVM and using a single instance of an object that
is
>a wrapper around Log4J?
>Should I synchronize all calls to category.log(...) method in my wrapper?
>Logging is being done to a local file.
That's perfectly safe. You do not need to synchronize. Ceki
----
Excellent!
Is that because the method is synchronized underneath?
Thanks,
Otis
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
