I remember something about an AsyncAppender in the mailing list a couple
of months ago that might be useful....
-Chris
On Thursday, March 29, 2001, at 01:46 PM, Alan Robertson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm developing a logging API for use by my company and am hoping I can
> use Log4J to implement this API. One of the requirements I must satisfy
> is that the logging tool I develop must do its processing in a separate
> thread from the code that calls it.
>
> To do so, I'm thinking that I can extend the Category class and
> overwrite the forcedLog() method to create the LoggingEvent object and
> then add it to a Vector which is a class variable. I would then also
> have this class implement Runnable and in the Run() method I could have
> a loop which pulls LoggingEvent objects off the Vector and invokes the
> callAppenders() method on them.
>
> Has anyone tried something similar and maybe have a better solution for
> how to do this? It occurs to me that having Log4J do most of its
> processing in a seperate thread might also improve its performace.
> Especially when you want to get location information on the caller. Is
> there a reason that Log4J does not do so?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alan Robertson
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> InfoNow Corp.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
