I think what you're describing ought to work just fine. Can you send a
properties file that contains non-log4j entries and which fails
configuring correctly?
Anders
korosh wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a web application that uses Log4j.
>
> I have alot of properties associated with this web application that I read
> off of a main property file.
>
> Wonderining if I could take all of the log4j varible=value pairs and just
> put them into this property file, call it myprops.properties and then feed
> this to the log4j configurator like:
>
> PropertyConfigurator.configure( myprops.properties )
>
> ???
>
> I tried the above, but the log4j complained that no appender defined for A1
> (my appender).
>
> I took the log4j varible/value pairs out of myprops.properties and put them
> into a seperate file and that did the job.
>
> all the entires in myprops.properties are varible/value pairs anyways. I
> assumed PropertyConfigurator would simply throw away all the other
> properties and only load the log4j.* entries.
>
> any ideas?
>
> i'd rather have one property file for my application only.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
