Our applications must deal with firewalls so we try to tunnel as much as
possible through RMI, one hole. Using your socket approach, I would
have to ask the sys admin to open up another hole in their firewall.
Cheers
Steve
Ceki Gülcü wrote:
> Steven,
>
> No. There isn't. It would be trivial to write one tough. Why would you want to use
>RMI in this case? Regards, Ceki
>
> At 06:30 01.06.2001 +0200, you wrote:
> >Instead of using the Socket Appender and the Socket Server, is there
> >an implementation that uses RMI?
> >
> >Regards
> >
> >Steven Hawkes
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
> Ceki Gülcü
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
