On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Hansen, Richard wrote: | Maybe it is just misnamed? I have not used Category.assert(), but it seems | like it could be useful. Of course frameworks are often littered with | "useful" but rarely used code. I agree. I don't use it now, but it seems cool. But it's badly misnamed. Deprecate the assert, and make a new one; e.g. logConditionally(cond[, level], msg[, exception]) (defaults to level error or info?) (I personally find a bunch of the things in log4j misnamed, though. Category.. Now, _why_ is is called category, and not Logger or something like that?) -- Mvh, Endre --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Category.assert() disappointing Zart Colwing
- RE: Category.assert() disappointing John Volkar
- RE: Category.assert() disappointing Simon Liu
- Re: Category.assert() disappointing Zart Colwing
- Re: Category.assert() disappointing Ceki Gülcü
- Re: Category.assert() disappointing Scott M Stark
- RE: Category.assert() disappointing John Volkar
- Re: Category.assert() disappointing mark . russel
- RE: Category.assert() disappointing Hansen, Richard
- Re: Category.assert() disappointing Benjamin Russell Stocum
- RE: Category.assert() disappointing Endre Stølsvik
- RE: Category.assert() disappointing Hansen, Richard
- Re: Category.assert() disappointing Benjamin Russell Stocum
- RE: Category.assert() disappointing Cakalic, James P.
- RE: Category.assert() disappointing Johan Karlsson TACMa