At 14:28 12.10.2001 -0700, you wrote: >>>No offense but the LogFactory code you suggested is crap. I am sure >>>you see the reasons for yourself. Please refrain from suggesting it >>>to other log4j users. Regards, Ceki > >Why is this "crap"? It is not obvious to me. We have a similar static >initializer and access methods in the log4j wrapper that we use. Do you >mean in the context of J2EE? What is a better way?
By its nature the approach is intrusive. It has to be used everywhere to be effective. -- Ceki Gülcü - http://qos.ch Link of the day: http://www.skeptictank.org/isaac.htm --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
