I find this curious since 1.2 is supposed to be backward compatible with 1.1.3. Does the wrapper use some deprecated methods or something? I'm sure it uses the Category class (which is migrating to the Logger class in 1.2), but that class is still available in 1.2. I haven't used the commons wrapper, but I did look at it fairly closely. Didn't seem heavy enough to become incompatible. Maybe I missed something.
-Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: Swami Iyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 9:28 AM > To: 'Log4J Users List'; Edward Q. Bridges > Subject: RE: log4j vs jdk 1.4 logging > > > The commons-logging will support log4j 1.1.3 and not log4j 1.2. If you > download the api, they have a wrapper which act as the > factory framework. > For log4j 1.2 a new wrapper need to be written. > > Swami > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: April 11, 2002 12:10 PM > > To: Edward Q. Bridges; Log4J Users List > > Subject: RE: log4j vs jdk 1.4 logging > > > > > > BTW, I couldn't find that information in the Commons documentation. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Edward Q. Bridges [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:10 AM > > To: Log4J Users List; Steve Cohen > > Subject: RE: log4j vs jdk 1.4 logging > > > > > > > > i'm not familiar enough with the differences between 1.2b3 > > and 1.1.3 to answer that. > > > > the site for the logging package is here: > > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/logging.html > > > > perhaps someone with more familiarity can answer this?? > > > > regards > > --e-- > > > > > > On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 09:41:04 -0500, Steve Cohen wrote: > > > > > Will the log4j adapter in the commons logging package work > > with version 1.2b3eta > > 4 of log4j or does it only work with 1.1.3, or does it not matter? > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Steve Cohen > > > Sr. Software Engineer > > > Ignite Sports, Inc. > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Edward Q. Bridges [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:41 PM > > > To: Log4J Users List; Steve Cohen > > > Subject: RE: log4j vs jdk 1.4 logging > > > > > > > > > i would strongly suggest that you switch your application > > to using the logging > > interface in > > > the jakarta commons package. then, you are free to plug in > > either log4j or jdk1.4. > > the > > > great flaw of both of these packages is that they were not > > coded from an interface, > > and > > > the interface they offer is what is hardcoded into their classes. > > > > > > HTH > > > --e-- > > > > > > On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 18:05:50 -0500, Steve Cohen wrote: > > > > I am in the position of recommending a switch to either > > log4j or jdk 1.4 from a > > > > roll-your-own system that has outgrown its original usefulness. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Edward Q. Bridges > > > http://www.teachscape.com > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > -- > > Edward Q. Bridges > > http://www.teachscape.com > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
