Oh OK. So does it mean that, as far as performance is concerned it does
not matter , whether there is one instance of Logger doing the logging,
or several Logger instances ?
On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 09:29, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
The Appender.doAppend method is syncronized for all appenders that are
shipped with log4j. See also the code in the
Category.callAppenders(LoggingEvent event) method. The synchronization
model has been improved in log4j 1.3.
At 09:13 AM 6/9/2003 -0700, you wrote:
>Hi All
>I understand that the Logger instance that gets created depends on the
>String that is passed to the static getLogger("some name") method of
>Logger. And this String usually is same as FQN of the class. But, we
>really do not need to use the FQN of the class , as our log messages
>are not going to be used for debugging purpose, so it does not matter
>from where they originated.
>So if we pass the same string always say "Activity" to the getLogger()
>method from every single class of our application, there will be One
>and only one instance of Logger that will perform the logging . Is that
>right ? if so, will it effect performance ? How about concurrency ?
>Any suggestions ?
>
>Thanks for the help
>
>--Viv
--
Ceki For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual"
ISBN: 2970036908 http://www.qos.ch/shop/products/clm_t.jsp
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
