Howdy, >Hmm... No reason why they shouldn't. I'm not sure?
Because you can change loggers as well, they don't HAVE to be final. They can be, and that's up to the developer, since the performance gain is so small. >>What's the school of thought between the naming conventions for the logger >>variable? >> >> private static final Logger LOG = Logger.getLogger(MyClass.class); >> >>or >> >> private static final Logger log = Logger.getLogger(MyClass.class); The former, certainly, for me, simply because of the code conventions and CheckStyle. Yoav Shapira This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
