Kevin A. Burton wrote:

Transport.send() usually blocks.

It seems to make sense to add a param to SMTPAppender to simply accept messages for delivery and them hand them off to a dedicated thread so that hte caller can return from log.info()...

Thoughts?

FYI... I was thinking on the way home that one could register their OWN transport which was threaded. The only problem is that the Transport class assumes its synchronous.

Though you could forward all these methods to the threaded class.

Kevin

--

Use Rojo (RSS/Atom aggregator). Visit http://rojo.com. Ask me for an invite! Also see irc.freenode.net #rojo if you want to chat.

Rojo is Hiring! - http://www.rojonetworks.com/JobsAtRojo.html

If you're interested in RSS, Weblogs, Social Networking, etc... then you should work for Rojo! If you recommend someone and we hire them you'll get a free iPod!
Kevin A. Burton, Location - San Francisco, CA
AIM/YIM - sfburtonator, Web - http://peerfear.org/
GPG fingerprint: 5FB2 F3E2 760E 70A8 6174 D393 E84D 8D04 99F1 4412



--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to