----- Original Message ----- From: "Endre Stølsvik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.jakarta.log4j.user
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 11:10 AM
Subject: RE: log4j trace enabled version
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005, Andy McBride wrote:
| You don't need to look at CVS to find what you are looking for.
|
| A search of the log4j-dev mailing list would have revealed many posts over
| the past year which answered your question. Perhaps you should look there
| before making remarks regarding what the log4j committers have and have not
| decided to do.
|
| A vote was taken on adding the trace level and the functionality you desire
| has already been added to the forthcoming log4j 1.3 release.
Yes it was decided to add it, but not in which version.
Ceki (and possibly others) totally refused to just add those majorly nice but _very simple_ changes to the 1.2.8 and 1.2.9 release. And now we're waiting for lots of other stuff that's for my part rather uninteresting. The 1.3 version does just not seem to happen.
1.3 comes when it's ready. And with it trace. Yes, okay. When? I want trace now, from a proper release.
Regards,
Endre.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
