Thanks. This did get me running. Now I am still not making any progress getting JMS logging to work, but... :)
"Scott Deboy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/02/2005 03:44:39 PM: > Chainsaw v2 was recently moved to its own CVS module. > > As you notice, the install-chainsaw.xml file hasn't been updated > since this move to the new module. > > I'd suggest grabbing the 'chainsaw-bundle.zip' file the same > binaries used by the Web Start version) instead of trying to build > from source until we get it updated. > > The 'download' link for the bundle is available right below the > 'Launch Now' link on the Chainsaw page: http://logging.apache. > org/log4j/docs/chainsaw.html > > Once you've unzipped the bundle, add everything to your classpath > and try again and you should have better luck. > > Scott > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thu 6/2/2005 12:32 PM > To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org > Cc: > Subject: Chainsaw & JMS/log4j ant build broken > I'm trying very hard to get Chainsaw v2 working with JMS. After reading a > lot of mailing list traffic (apparently the only available documentation > for this outside the source code), I tried very hard to get this to work > with the Java Web Start-based chainsaw install, with no success. > > I figured out that there is a plugin directory, and where it lives, and > what its called, installed the log4j-jms.jar, a jms provider (ActiveMQ), > and dependent jars. It still doesn't work; classloader problems prevent > the JMS receiver from initializing with my jndi.properties (specifying an > ActiveMQ-provided initial context fails with a ClassNotFound, even though > the jar is there). > > Reasoning this was a Java Web Start problem, I decided to give up and work > with Chainsaw via ant. That's when I discovered that log4j1.3 alpha 6 > doesn't build at all - because a chainsaw-specific ant file is missing. I > switched to following the instructions on the web > ("install-chainsaw.xml"), and discovered this is seriously broken. There > is *no* chainsaw ant target in the current log4j trunk. It's been removed, > and I can find no replacement in that build.xml or anywhere else in the > tree. > > I spent some time reading over the dev list trying to look for an > announcement or any other clue, but all I can see is normal traffic from > people using the tool. > > What am I missing? Is anyone using Chainsaw v2 successfully via ant? Or > (too amazing to be true) with JMS? I would truly appreciate any hint as to > how such a thing is possible. > > Best regards, > David > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]