Have you looked at the socket stuff? That's what I currently use. -----Original Message----- From: Mark Lybarger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 10:37 AM To: Log4J Users List Subject: jms appender
we're interested in creating a centraliszed logging solution. we'd also like to have logging have as little impact to the application (logging should be fast). our thought is to combine a jms logger on the "client" side, and have a jms listerner which logs the message using jdbc logger. are there any gotchas to watch out for something like this? will the logging maintain its consistancy over a local filesystem based logging (meaning that the logs are in the correct order)? will a jms logger on the client be heavier or lighter than a filesystem based logger? would it be a good idea to use a MDB to process the incoming logs, or just a jms listener? thanks! ~mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
