Hi Scott, 2009/3/26 Scott Deboy <[email protected]>
> You can include in Chainsaw's configuration any appenders you'd like, which > will cause any events received by the receivers to be propagated to the > appenders automatically. How can I do that? What I am doing now is to launch Chainsaw and when I am prompted at the beginning that no receivers have been defined I select the option "Let me search for a configuration file" and then load my config file that contains the following code to define my own XmlSocketReceiver: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?> <!DOCTYPE log4j:configuration PUBLIC "-//log4j/log4j Configuration//EN" "log4j.dtd"> <log4j:configuration xmlns:log4j="http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/"; debug="false"> <plugin name="XmlSocketReceiver" class="org.apache.log4j.net.XMLSocketReceiver"> <param name="active" value="false"/> <param name="decoder" value="org.apache.log4j.xml.XMLDecoder"/> <param name="name" value="NRTPXmlSocketReceiver" /> <param name="port" value="4445" /> </plugin> <root> <level value="debug"/> </root> </log4j:configuration> What you say is that is possible to define in that configuration file too one appender that redirects all messages that the XmlSocketReceiver is reading and the display is showing to a text log file in the same way is done usually in a log4j properties file with a RollingFileAppender for example? Or do I have to define this appender in a separate file and load it too in Chainsaw? > > > You can also save logging events as XML in Chainsaw via the file menu > (note, > whatever events are displayed are saved, so you can apply filters if you'd > like to only save relevant messages). > > Scott > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Moley Harey <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi again, > > > > I have done the following test and is working fine: > > > > 1. Update my log4cxx.properties file to send all messages through a > > XmlSocketAppender like this: > > > > log4j.appender.A1=org.apache.log4j.net.XmlSocketAppender > > log4j.appender.A1.Port=4560 > > log4j.appender.A1.RemoteHost=127.0.0.1 > > > > 2. Launch Chainsaw with teh following configuration file that specifies > it > > should be using an XmlSocketReceived like this: > > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?> > > <!DOCTYPE log4j:configuration PUBLIC "-//log4j/log4j Configuration//EN" > > "log4j.dtd"> > > <log4j:configuration xmlns:log4j="http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/"; > > debug="false"> > > > > <plugin name="XmlSocketReceiver" > > class="org.apache.log4j.net.XMLSocketReceiver"> > > <param name="active" value="false"/> > > <param name="decoder" value="org.apache.log4j.xml.XMLDecoder"/> > > <param name="name" value="MyXmlSocketReceiver" /> > > <param name="port" value="4560" /> > > </plugin> > > > > <root> > > <level value="debug"/> > > </root> > > </log4j:configuration> > > > > This is working OK, Chainsaw registers without problem the new receiver > > "MyXmlSocketReceiver" and log messages sent by my C++ application are > > correctly displayed, so clearly the problem was in the SimpleSocketServer > > that I used. > > > > One question, what I initially wanted was to write in a single log file > all > > those messages, but now that Chainsaw allows me to display and include > the > > SocketServer that understands "XmlSocket" formatted messages I was > thinking > > adding to Chain saw code the feature to write in a single log file and I > > would have all I need plus a nice display... > > > > Do you think this is feasible? > > Does Chainsaw bring the feature not only to display messages but to save > > them into a log file? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Mh > > > > 2009/3/26 Moley Harey <[email protected]> > > > > > Hi Dmitry and old, > > > > > > Do you know if the available SimpleSocketServer already include the > > > possibility of using it with a XMLSocketReceiver? > > > Or does log4j provide something similar to the code used in Chainsaw? > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > Mh > > > > > > 2009/3/26 Dmitry <[email protected]> > > > > > > On the server side you must use XML based receiver as well. > > >> Non java applications (c,c++,.net,etc..) must send logging events in > XML > > >> serialized form and get reconstructed on the server into Java objects > > from > > >> this XML. > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Kind regards, > > >> Dmitry > > >> > > >> www.moonlit-software.com > > >> > > >> Moley Harey wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi, thanks for your answers... > > >>> > > >>> I changed the appender in my log4cxx properties file to be a > > >>> XMLSocketAppender and now I get the following exception when trying > to > > >>> connect to my SocketServer: > > >>> > > >>> 2009-03-26 09:35:08,528 INFO NRTSocketServer - NRTSocketServer :: > > >>> Connected > > >>> to client at /127.0.0.1 > > >>> 2009-03-26 09:35:08,528 INFO NRTSocketServer - NRTSocketServer :: > > >>> Starting > > >>> new socket node. > > >>> 2009-03-26 09:35:08,534 ERROR org.apache.log4j.net.SocketNode - Could > > not > > >>> open ObjectInputStream to Socket[addr=/127.0.0.1 > > >>> ,port=37049,localport=4445] > > >>> java.io.StreamCorruptedException: invalid stream header > > >>> at > > >>> > java.io.ObjectInputStream.readStreamHeader(ObjectInputStream.java:764) > > >>> at > java.io.ObjectInputStream.<init>(ObjectInputStream.java:277) > > >>> at org.apache.log4j.net.SocketNode.<init>(SocketNode.java:55) > > >>> at NRTSocketServer.main(NRTSocketServer.java:46) > > >>> > > >>> My SocketServer is based on the log4j Java class SimpleSocketServer, > is > > >>> this > > >>> class able to receive XML messages sent by log4cxx using > > >>> XMLSocketAppender? > > >>> Or do I have to implement a different Java SocketServer that > understand > > >>> these messages? > > >>> > > >>> 2009/3/25 Dmitry <[email protected]> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>> You must use XMLSocketAppender to send log from any non-Java client > to > > >>>> Java > > >>>> server. > > >>>> Put something like this into your C++ properties file : > > >>>> log4j.appender.A1=org.apache.log4j.net.XMLSocketAppender > > >>>> log4j.appender.A1.RemoteHost=localhost > > >>>> log4j.appender.A1.Port=12345 > > >>>> It should work.. > > >>>> > > >>>> Kind regards, > > >>>> Dmitry > > >>>> http://www.moonlit-software.com > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Moley Harey wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>> Hi folks, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I have implemented a Java SimpleSocketServer application that is > > >>>>> running > > >>>>> with log4j version 1.2, I have done a test Java class that > initialize > > >>>>> the > > >>>>> logging and sends a couple of messages to the SimpleSocketServer > and > > >>>>> works > > >>>>> fine, all messages sent by the test class are succesfully written > in > > >>>>> the > > >>>>> same log file. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Then I have done the same with a C++ log4cxx application, updating > > the > > >>>>> log4cxx.properties file to be like this: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> log4j.rootCategory=DEBUG,stdout,A1 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> log4j.appender.stdout=org.apache.log4j.ConsoleAppender > > >>>>> log4j.appender.stdout.layout=org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout > > >>>>> > > >>>>> log4j.appender.stdout.layout.ConversionPattern=%5p [%t] (%F:%L) - > > %m%n > > >>>>> > > >>>>> # A1 is set to be a SocketAppender sending its output to the server > > >>>>> running > > >>>>> on the remote host, port 4445 > > >>>>> log4j.appender.A1=org.apache.log4j.net.SocketAppender > > >>>>> log4j.appender.A1.Port=4445 > > >>>>> log4j.appender.A1.RemoteHost=127.0.0.1 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I have run my C++ application and what I get in my log file are > just > > >>>>> the > > >>>>> following messages: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> 2009-03-25 17:14:33,914 INFO NRTSocketServer - NRTSocketServer :: > > >>>>> Connected > > >>>>> to client at /127.0.0.1 > > >>>>> 2009-03-25 17:14:33,969 INFO NRTSocketServer - NRTSocketServer :: > > >>>>> Starting > > >>>>> new socket node. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> And after this no debug or info message is logged, just when my C++ > > >>>>> application has finished I get the following message: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> 2009-03-25 17:16:25,290 ERROR org.apache.log4j.net.SocketNode - > Could > > >>>>> not > > >>>>> open ObjectInputStream to Socket[addr=/127.0.0.1 > > >>>>> ,port=36965,localport=4445] > > >>>>> java.io.EOFException > > >>>>> at > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > > java.io.ObjectInputStream$PeekInputStream.readFully(ObjectInputStream.java:2228) > > >>>>> at > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > > java.io.ObjectInputStream$BlockDataInputStream.readShort(ObjectInputStream.java:2694) > > >>>>> at > > >>>>> > > java.io.ObjectInputStream.readStreamHeader(ObjectInputStream.java:761) > > >>>>> at > java.io.ObjectInputStream.<init>(ObjectInputStream.java:277) > > >>>>> at org.apache.log4j.net.SocketNode.<init>(SocketNode.java:55) > > >>>>> at NRTSocketServer.main(NRTSocketServer.java:46) > > >>>>> > > >>>>> So from logging messages from Java application using log4j to Java > > >>>>> ServerSocket works fine, but from C++ application using log4cxx > 0.10 > > >>>>> does > > >>>>> not work... > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Could be the problem the type of Appender I am using? Maybe I > should > > >>>>> use > > >>>>> something like XMLSocketAppender or so? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Thanks in advance, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Mh > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > — Las cosas que vemos —dijo Pistorius con voz apagada— son las mismas > > cosas > > > que llevamos en nosotros. > > > No hay más realidad que la que tenemos dentro. (Herman Hesse) > > > > > > http://moleyharey.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > — Las cosas que vemos —dijo Pistorius con voz apagada— son las mismas > cosas > > que llevamos en nosotros. > > No hay más realidad que la que tenemos dentro. (Herman Hesse) > > > > http://moleyharey.blogspot.com/ > > > -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ — Las cosas que vemos —dijo Pistorius con voz apagada— son las mismas cosas que llevamos en nosotros. No hay más realidad que la que tenemos dentro. (Herman Hesse) http://moleyharey.blogspot.com/
