Thanks Scott. Is there a nightly binary build available somewhere?
-- Hari

On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I was able to load your events into the latest version of Chainsaw without
> issues.
>
> I assume you're using the version available from the log4j web site (Web
> Start or bundle download).  There have been significant changes made to
> LogFilePatternReceiver since that version was released - those changes
> probably addressed your issues.  Hopefully we'll make another release soon
> that will include these fixes.
>
> You could build Chainsaw yourself from source, but it's a pretty
> complicated
> and fragile process (since it requires you to build log4j and friends via
> maven (and resolve external dependencies).  Hopefully that process will
> improve as well.
>
> Scott
>
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Hari Krishna Dara <harid...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Here are the lines copy pasted:
> >
> > 2009-08-22 20:05:24,526 root         MainThread INFO     STARTING ...
> > 2009-08-22 20:05:24,526 database     MainThread DEBUG    Connecting ...
> > 2009-08-22 20:05:24,542 database     MainThread DEBUG
>  F2SQLServerCursor
> > ...
> > 2009-08-22 20:05:24,542 database     MainThread DEBUG    SQL: ...
> >                  SELECT ...
> >                  FROM ...
> >
> > 2009-08-22 20:05:24,542 root         MainThread INFO     Starting thread
> > ...
> > 2009-08-22 20:05:24,542 root         MainThread INFO     Waiting for
> > thread: ...
> > 2009-08-22 20:05:24,542 worker       ReportingSummarization.main INFO
> > Thr...
> > 2009-08-22 20:05:24,542 reportingsummarization
> > ReportingSummarization.main INFO     Starting run ...
> > 2009-08-22 20:05:24,542 database     ReportingSummarization.main DEBUG
> >  Con...
> >
> > -- Hari
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:51 AM,
> > <log4j-user-digest-h...@logging.apache.org> wrote:
> > > From: Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com>
> > > To: Log4J Users List <log4j-user@logging.apache.org>
> > > Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:49:55 -0700
> > > Subject: Re: reading python logging from chainsaw
> > > Sorry, file attachments are stripped from the mailing list...just
> provide
> > > example entries in email and I'll look into it.
> > >
> > > Scott
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Hari Krishna Dara <harid...@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Scott. The attached file has sample log that has only one line
> > > > parsed correctly (log ID: 8), the rest have it wrong. Save this file
> > > > and use the below options for LogFilePatternReceiver:
> > > >
> > > > fileURL: file:///c:/tmp/refresh_reporting.log
> > > > logFormat: TIMESTAMP LOGGER THREAD LEVEL MESSAGE
> > > > name: refresh_reporting
> > > >
> > > > If you save to a different directory than c:\tmp, change it
> > > > accordingly. If you don't use windows, you may have to change the
> > > > number of slashes (not sure). Name can be anything.
> > > >
> > > > I don't currently have the log that I generated with fixed width of
> 40
> > > > characters for thread name, but if you need that I can try to
> generate
> > > > it again (or change the attached log file to have a fixed width for
> > > > thread name). I expected that to parse better, but even the log ID: 8
> > > > didn't parse in that context.
> > > >
> > > > -- Hari
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 6:49 PM,
> > > > <log4j-user-digest-h...@logging.apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > > > From: Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com>
> > > > > To: Log4J Users List <log4j-user@logging.apache.org>
> > > > > Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:34:15 -0700
> > > > > Subject: Re: reading python logging from chainsaw
> > > > > If you can post a few lines of the log containing the example text
> > that
> > > > > parses correctly and incorrectly, we can probably help you figure
> out
> > > > what
> > > > > needs to be changed.
> > > > >
> > > > > Scott
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Hari Krishna Dara <
> > harid...@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I have been occasionally using chainsaw to analyze log files
> > generated
> > > > from
> > > > > > python. I use the LogFilePatternReceiver with a file:// url and
> it
> > > > worked
> > > > > > fairly well for the python log format of "%(asctime)s %(name)-12s
> > > > > > %(levelname)-8s %(message)s" and chainsaw pattern of "TIMESTAMP
> > LOGGER
> > > > > > LEVEL
> > > > > > MESSAGE".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am now trying to get it working with the threadname in the
> > pattern,
> > > > but
> > > > > > chainsaw doesn't seem to match the pattern properly. I changed
> the
> > > > python
> > > > > > format to "%(asctime)s %(name)-12s %(threadName)s %(levelname)-8s
> > > > > > %(message)s" and chainsaw pattern to "TIMESTAMP LOGGER THREAD
> LEVEL
> > > > > > MESSAGE", however, chainsaw doesn't recognize the threadname in
> > most of
> > > > the
> > > > > > cases. In fact, it fails to recognize the level in most cases. It
> > > > appears
> > > > > > as
> > > > > > though, when the level is INFO, I can see the threadname and
> level
> > > > > > recognized, otherwise, THREAD and LEVEL are clubbed into MSG.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I then tried assigning fixed width to threadname
> > (%(threadName)-40s),
> > > > in
> > > > > > case that is what is causing the confusion, but this actually
> made
> > it
> > > > even
> > > > > > worse. Is there a way to fine tune how LogFilePatternReceiver
> > > > recognizes
> > > > > > different fields in the log? May be a way to specify the field
> > widths?
> > > > I am
> > > > > > using v2. I would appreciate any help.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to