Either:
you patch the apache class yourself or submit a bug to its developers (or
both)
Or:
you implement a workaround:
- exclude the path of your own class (like it is seen by the apache
getClass():
<logger name="my.company.HttpClient" additivity="false">
<level value="off"/>
</logger>
- instantiate your own logger with an artificial addendum in the name:
private final static Log log = LogFactory.getLog(
"my.company.reallyMy.HttpClient" );
and configure it like:
<logger name="my.company.reallyMy.HttpClient">
<level value="debug"/>
</logger>
remember: the name of the logger is just a name. Using the package/Classname
is just a convention and not a must.
Or - of course - both.
Heri
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Angeli106 [mailto:angeli...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. März 2010 15:51
An: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Path exclusion for logs
Turns out u were right, the parent class(AbstractHttpClient) instantiates the
log like this:
private final Log log = LogFactory.getLog(getClass());
Also turns out that this is a commons.logging logger and not a log4j as i
thought Also it looks like it's private so i can't override it, any ideas?
Bender Heri wrote:
>
> Probably the parent class does not instantiate his logger statically
> but like this:
>
> Logger logger = Logger.getLogger( this.getClass().getName() );
>
> and therefore it retrieves a logger with the name of your descendant
> (name starting with your namespace). If it would instantiate it statically:
>
> static Logger logger = Logger.getLogger( org.apache.
> ..ApacheParent.class );
>
> then the name of the logger would start with "org.apache. .." and
> would be excluded if you have a corresponding configuration.
>
> Just a guess. If this is not the case, you should submit your config
> file for further analyzis.
>
> Heri
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Angeli106 [mailto:angeli...@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. März 2010 14:50
> An: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
> Betreff: Path exclusion for logs
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a java class inheriting from an apache class file. The apache
> class file is packaged in org.apache... and such i do not see the logs
> for it, which is great. However, my own class is within my namespace
> (which i'm
> logging) and as such it now writes the logs of the parent class.. my
> question is, can i exclude certain paths from the log? (such as the
> path for the class that i've inherited)
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Path-exclusion-for-logs-tp27945800p27945800.html
> Sent from the Log4j - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Path-exclusion-for-logs-tp27945800p27946728.html
Sent from the Log4j - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
