Oh good point. We'll do security updates and such, but no more new features or anything. It's in maintenance-only mode.
On 28 April 2014 18:46, Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com> wrote: > It is not true that we don't maintain 1.2 any longer. If important issues > are found we may still address them even though we are focused on Log4j2. > On Apr 28, 2014 4:01 PM, "Matt Sicker" <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > We don't maintain 1.2.x anymore. Also, I think you're supposed to use ant > > to build 1.2. > > > > Please check out Log4j 2.0, though, as we're preparing to release that > and > > would like feedback. > > > > > > On 28 April 2014 14:30, <walter_mar...@dellteam.com> wrote: > > > > > Dell - Internal Use - Confidential > > > > > > > > > 1) The pom file has to be updated to allow for maven-site-plugin > 3.3 > > > rather than 3.1 > > > > > > 2) The mvm staging step gives a null pointer exception > > > > > > Apache.log4j-1.2.17 > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Walter > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > > > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
