Is it not possible to just use ThreadLocal? Is that not safe enough or does it waste too many resources?
On 3 September 2014 18:39, Mohit Anchlia <mohitanch...@gmail.com> wrote: > Issue created > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-812 > > > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > wrote: > > > The converter uses a SimpleDateFormat which is not thread safe and so is > > synchronized. I am sure there might be minor optimizations that could be > > done to this > > > > What I would do is modify DatePatternConverter to > > a) use Java 8’s java.time.format.DateTimeFormatter if running on Java 8 > > b) use Joda Time’s DateTimeFormat if it is present. > > c) create a pool of SimpleDateFormat objects and use those. > > > > Please create a Jira issue for this. > > > > Ralph > > > > On Sep 3, 2014, at 3:00 PM, Mohit Anchlia <mohitanch...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > I am using log4j2 and I am seeing almost all the threads > > > momentarily getting blocked on > > > org.apache.loggin.log4j.core.pattern.DatePatternConverter class. Is > this > > > expected? > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org > > > > > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
