Is is even necessary to add Logstash to the mix? I think that Log4j 2 should be able to whatever is necessary by itself without either Flume or Logstash.
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:56 PM, David KOCH <dk...@ezakus.com> wrote: > We use log4j2's SyslogAppender and a logstash UDP input source, works ok > for us, no need to add Flume to the mix. > > /David > > On 18 November 2015 at 22:35, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Any experience with this? I was thinking of using Flume and the Flume > > appender to route all my log messages to an ELK stack, but I was > wondering > > if there were other ways of doing this. > > > > -- > > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > > > -- [image: MagineTV] *Mikael Ståldal* Senior software developer *Magine TV* mikael.stal...@magine.com Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.
