Is this feature in SLF4J too? Or is it dependent on the logging
implementation being used?

On 29 January 2016 at 18:19, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes, it is supposed to work. But like Gary I have on occasion found that
> it does not. I am not sure why.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Jan 29, 2016, at 4:57 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Remko, that's exactly the method I was thinking of. It almost seems to
> be a
> > hidden feature. I was arguing with a co-worker earlier today about it and
> > he doesn't believe me that you can do this, partly because it's not
> > documented anywhere as far as I can tell.
> >
> > On 29 January 2016 at 17:06, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Really? I thought ParameterizedMessage took care of that: it checks that
> >> the last param is a Throwable.
> >>
> >>
> https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/log4j-api/xref/org/apache/logging/log4j/message/ParameterizedMessage.html#L138
> >>
> >> StringFormattedMessage also:
> >>
> https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/log4j-api/xref/org/apache/logging/log4j/message/StringFormattedMessage.html#L45
> >>
> >> Does this not work correctly?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >>> On 2016/01/30, at 7:22, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> That only works when you call an API that is typed with Throwable.
> >>>
> >>> G
> >>>> On Jan 29, 2016 2:11 PM, "Matt Sicker" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Why can't it log the stack trace as well? Can't you specify
> >>>> %throwable{full} in the pattern?
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 29 January 2016 at 16:00, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What is misleading IMO is that the var arg API will NOT log the stack
> >>>>> trace.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There is no way to log with a message template, args, and also an
> >>>>> exception.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This bites me from time to time.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What I need is an API that looks like this:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Logger.debug(ex, "blah {} {}", arg1, arg2):
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Gary
> >>>>>> On Jan 29, 2016 1:28 PM, "Matt Sicker" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Like when you do logger.debug("{}", foo, ex). I know it's supported,
> >>>> but
> >>>>> I
> >>>>>> can't find anywhere that this is mentioned.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> >>>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>


-- 
Matt Sicker <[email protected]>

Reply via email to