What do you plan beyond supporting
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/nio/file/attribute/PosixFilePermission.html

?

Gary

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Demetrios Dimatos <dima...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Will do, needs some more work but looking to see if the community would
> accept seeing as they rejected a similar proposal long back. Opening a JIRA
> - Question now. Thanks.
>
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Oh, and make sure you base your patch on the git master branch.
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > On Nov 11, 2016 9:12 PM, "Gary Gregory" <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, cool.
> > >
> > > Gary
> > >
> > > On Nov 11, 2016 9:10 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos" <dima...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Gary,
> > >> We are using Log4j2, I thought to take it to the mail list before a
> > >> opening
> > >> a JIRA. I will open a JIRA for this.
> > >> Thank you ,
> > >>
> > >> On Friday, November 11, 2016, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Which version of Log4j are you using?
> > >> >
> > >> > Bugzilla is no longer used and we no longer support adding to Log4j
> 1.
> > >> >
> > >> > For Log4j 2 patches and requests, please use Jira.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thank you,
> > >> > Gary
> > >> >
> > >> > On Nov 11, 2016 8:18 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos" <dima...@gmail.com
> > >> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Hello All,
> > >> > > We would like to hear the communities thoughts on being able to
> > >> configure
> > >> > > the permissions log files are created with. We don't want to rely
> on
> > >> > UMASK
> > >> > > because we have managed services who's process should generate
> logs
> > >> with
> > >> > a
> > >> > > 644 yet deployed applications by users should default to a 640
> > because
> > >> > the
> > >> > > logs may contain sensitive information.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > We are able to make the modification and set this in the
> properties
> > >> file.
> > >> > > Now we are looking to see what the community position would be on
> > >> > accepting
> > >> > > such a patch, we don't want to be patching our own distribution.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I searched all the JIRAs and was not able to find any matching
> > >> > requirements
> > >> > > recently. All I could find was something dated in 2006:
> > >> > > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40407
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thank you.
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
>



-- 
E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
<https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1617290459/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1617290459&linkCode=as2&tag=garygregory-20&linkId=cadb800f39946ec62ea2b1af9fe6a2b8>

<http:////ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=garygregory-20&l=am2&o=1&a=1617290459>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition
<https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1935182021/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1935182021&linkCode=as2&tag=garygregory-20&linkId=31ecd1f6b6d1eaf8886ac902a24de418%22>

<http:////ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=garygregory-20&l=am2&o=1&a=1935182021>
Spring Batch in Action
<https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1935182951/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1935182951&linkCode=%7B%7BlinkCode%7D%7D&tag=garygregory-20&linkId=%7B%7Blink_id%7D%7D%22%3ESpring+Batch+in+Action>
<http:////ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=garygregory-20&l=am2&o=1&a=1935182951>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Reply via email to