The Java 9 module support is still fairly new. We have had reports that it is still rough around the edges.
Ralph > On Feb 20, 2018, at 3:06 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Log4j 2.10 still requires Java 7. We're planning to require Java 8 only in > Log4j 3.x. The Java 9 support is so that if you're running in Java 9, you > can take advantage of modules and a couple alternative class > implementations due to new standard APIs ported from formerly internal JDK > APIs. > > On 20 February 2018 at 15:33, Andrejus Chaliapinas < > andrej...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > >> Hi, >> Would it be possible on this dependencies page:https://logging.apache. >> org/log4j/2.0/runtime-dependencies.html >> to specify if v2.10.0 still works with Java 7 or 8 as stated for v2.9.1 or >> mostly Java 9 is now targeted? And if there could be now some side effects >> with Java 8 (like LOG4J2-2129) while Log4j2 code is progressing to Java 9 >> modules approach? >> >> Thank you,Andrejus >> > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
