Yes.  As a test, I set the configuration to rollover every minute.  Running a 
test application that takes negligible time to run and then running it again a 
few minutes later produces no rollover. Log messages from both executions get 
logged to the same file.

Here are the contents of the log4j2.xml:

*******

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE Configuration>
<Configuration status="WARN">
    <Appenders>
        <RollingFile name="RollingLogFile"
            fileName="logs/rolling.log"
            filePattern="logs/rolling-%d{yyyy-MM-dd-HH-mm}.log.gz"
            createOnDemand="true">
            <PatternLayout
                pattern="%d{HH:mm:ss.SSS} %-5level - %msg%n" />
            <Policies>
                <TimeBasedTriggeringPolicy modulate="true"
                    interval="1" />
                <OnStartupTriggeringPolicy />
            </Policies>
            <DefaultRolloverStrategy />
        </RollingFile>
    </Appenders>
    <Loggers>
        <Root level="error">
            <AppenderRef ref="RollingLogFile" />
        </Root>
    </Loggers>
</Configuration>

*******

On 2018-05-14 01:55 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:

Are you using OnStartupTriggeringPolicy?
http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/appenders.html#RollingFileAppender

On 14 May 2018 at 12:47, Hachey, Philip 
<philip.hac...@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca><mailto:philip.hac...@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>
wrote:



Hello.  This is a question about how to achieve a particular result with
log4j2, but I expect may instead be a *feature request*.

I have a Java application that runs for a few minutes each hour via a cron
job (java -jar...). It runs in its own JVM, *not* in a continuously running
environment like Tomcat. I am using Log4j 2.11 to do logging. Within the
application, I have a particular logger with specific rollover requirements:

1. Log to "rolling.log"
2. At the end of each day (or on the first logging event of a new day),
rolling.log should be rolled over to rolling-yyyy-MM-dd.log.gz and new
logging events added to a fresh rolling.log.

I cannot get this to work.  It appears to me that time-based rollovers are
only ever triggered if the application is running at the time the rollover
would happen.

For an example of how log4j2 handles things currently, suppose this order
of events for a logger configured to rollover daily.

23:30 -- cronjob runs application for 10 minutes, logging to rolling.log
00:00 -- new day; rollover would happen here but application is not running
00:30 -- cronjob runs application for 10 minutes, still logging to
rolling.log and no rollover happens

Result: both days of application log messages are logged to the same file:
rolling.log, without any rollover.


Feature Request (assuming there is not already a way do this): Allow
time-based rollover to trigger if, upon application execution, it is noted
that the time a rollover should have happened was after the previous
application execution.

E.g.:
23:30 -- cronjob runs application for 10 minutes, logging to rolling.log
00:00 -- new day; rollover would happen here but application is not running
00:30 -- cronjob runs application for 10 minutes; at start of execution
(or first log message), log4j2 notes that a rollover should have happened
and so rolls over the existing rolling.log and adds all new log messages to
a new rolling.log file.

Hint: to do this, log4j will likely need to record a timestamp of the last
log message or when the application previously terminated, then read this
time stamp on application start (or first log message).

Note: I originally posted this question on Stack Overflow and additional
details, including test code and my attempts at log4j2 configuration, may
be found there:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48874164/how-to-
configure-log4j2-to-rollover-with-time-stamp-on-startup

Thank you,
Philip








Reply via email to