For our use case BasicContextSelector works as expected. We really don't
need one async logger, disruptor, thread, etc per class loader.

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018, 1:12 PM Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
wrote:

> The default context selector is ClassLoaderContextSelector which creates a
> LoggerContext for each ClassLoader. This means that if you were to start
> and stop a bundle the Logging environment for that bundle should clean up.
> When you use the BasicContextSelector there is only a single LoggerContext
> for the whole application. As to which is correct for an OSGi environment I
> couldn’t say.  If we need a context selector specifically for OSGi
> environments that can certainly be implemented, but we would have to know
> what the expected behavior is. Of course, you can always implement it and
> submit it as a patch to a Jira issue.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Jul 25, 2018, at 9:44 AM, Leon Finker <leon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Use case: provide log4j2 logging in Felix OSGi application. Nothing OSGi
> specific as far as logging concerned. Simply need to log all logging events
> to configured log file for the application. Using async logging.
> >
> > If we run log4j2 (any current version) with default context selector,
> then we noticed that each OSGi bundle creates a separate AsyncLoggerConfig*
> thread with its own Disruptor, RingBuffer, etc. We have about 30+ bundles.
> Only by setting Log4jContextSelector to
> org.apache.logging.log4j.core.selector.BasicContextSelector, this is
> prevented and one AsyncLoggerConfig/Disruptor/RingBuffer is created.
> >
> > Is this expected?
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to