[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12868153#action_12868153
]
Stefan Bodewig commented on LOG4NET-164:
----------------------------------------
You should probably move the Mutex-releasing code of CloseFile into a finally
block so it will be performed even if CloseStream fails.
Other than deciding on the name (which I'm not really good at) is there
anything else that needs to b done in order to resolve this issue?
> using a named mutex for file appenders
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: LOG4NET-164
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-164
> Project: Log4net
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Appenders
> Reporter: Frank
> Assignee: Ron Grabowski
> Fix For: 1.2.11
>
> Attachments: MutexProcessLock.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 24h
> Remaining Estimate: 24h
>
> About logging to the same file from 2 or more instances of an application.
> As opposed to a minimallock which makes it still possible for 2 application
> instances to interfere. Why not use a named mutex so that the logging will
> wait for the lock to be released from another instance.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
