If log4net2.x will imply a port of log4j2 then I think we should do log4net 1.3 and remove the .NET 1.x support.
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Dominik Psenner <dpsen...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 1.2.11 already contained breaking changes and so did 1.2.12. Thus I > would > >> not mind breaking backwards compatibility within 1.X even further. The > next > >> good milestone could be 1.3 RC1 since we won't be compatible with log4j2 > >and > >> we should go to 2.X only if we port log4j2 features into log4net. > > > >At least in JIRA I've set the expectation 2.x would be the version that > >drops .NET 1.x support. But that can be rectified easily. > > > >Would you also drop .NET 1.x support in 1.3.x then? > > +1 > >
