+1



with following questions/remarks:

no build for .NET 4.5, but I assume this was already discussed before and is 
planned for a subsequent release


do we position “net” binaries as targeting only MS .NET, or are they suppose to 
be cross-CLR / cross-platform?







Van: Stefan Bodewig
Verzonden: ‎zondag‎ ‎10‎ ‎november‎ ‎2013 ‎9‎:‎54
Aan: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org, gene...@logging.apache.org





Hi all,

per discussion of the last few days we intend to cut a final(?) release
from the 1.2.x branch fixing some problems with the ILog extensions and
compilation for the compact framework.

log4net 1.2.13 RC2 is available for review here:
  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net
  (revision 3469)

Details of changes since 1.2.12 are in the release notes:
  http://logging.apache.org/log4net/log4net-1.2.13/release/release-notes.html

  (note, I've already committed the site ot the live system but it is
  not reachable by any links - the 1.2.12 site is the one shown by default)

I have tested this with Mono and several .NET frameworks using NAnt.

The tag is here:
  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/tags/1.2.13RC2
  (revision 1540448)

Site:
  http://logging.apache.org/log4net/log4net-1.2.13/

RAT Report:
  http://logging.apache.org/log4net/log4net-1.2.13/rat-report.html

Votes, please.  This vote will close in 72 hours, 0900 GMT 13-Nov
2013

[ ] +1 Release these artifacts
[ ] +0 OK, but...
[ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
[ ] -1 I oppose this release because...

Thanks!

        Stefan

Reply via email to