Great news! Stefan, I know you do not have much spare time. Would you please build 1.2.15rc1? On 3 Dec 2015 11:56 p.m., "Jeremiah Gowdy" <jerem...@gowdy.me> wrote:
> We have tested and that appears to work. +1 to the 1.2.15 release. > > On Dec 2, 2015, at 11:35 PM, Dominik Psenner <dpsen...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This has been backported to trunk with svn revision 1714267. The 1.2.14 > tag is on svn revision 1713733 which means that it hasn't made it into > 1.2.14 but is included if you build log4net from source. I've tagged > 1.2.15RC1 and it would be great if you could test with that tag. This is > the svn url to the tag: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/tags/1.2.15RC1 > > Cheers > > On 2015-12-03 02:23, Jeremiah Gowdy wrote: > > Okay, our testing showed a bad result. 1.2.14 doesn’t fix the async/await > context issues. > > It looks like LOG4NET-462 didn’t get merged into 1.2.14. Our special > build of log4net includes that fix, and we don’t have async/await context > issues. > > > https://github.com/apache/log4net/commit/f26857ebf848f067fde375e3bb32a736cf77ed9a > > I don’t see that in the 1.2.x branch. Am I not seeing this correctly? > > > On Nov 29, 2015, at 2:24 PM, Jeremiah Gowdy <jerem...@gowdy.me> wrote: > > It's going out with our next release to QA, next week. > > On Nov 29, 2015, at 7:40 AM, Dominik Psenner < <dpsen...@gmail.com> > dpsen...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Jeremiah, whats the state of your deployment? Have you made a notice of > all the bugs I had introduced and that they are fixed in trunk? > On 29 Nov 2015 4:38 p.m., "Dominik Psenner" <dpsen...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On 29 Nov 2015 10:54 a.m., "Jeremiah Gowdy" <jerem...@gowdy.me> wrote: >> > >> > Agreed. We have to start drawing the drawing the line. .NET is so >> backwards compatible, I think it's pretty left behind to leave .NET 2.0 and >> beyond behind. As a carrier grade application we are far beyond needing >> 2.0 support. >> >> Beware, there are devices out there that support only .net 3.5. i am glad >> we could come to a sound agreement. >> >> > >> > > On Nov 28, 2015, at 11:01 PM, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > > >> > >> On 2015-11-27, Dominik Psenner wrote: >> > >> >> > >> In my opinion, all releases after 1.2.15 should be built against: >> > > >> > >> * mono 3.5 >> > >> * mono 4.0 >> > >> * .net 3.5 >> > >> * .net 4.0 >> > >> * .net 4.5 >> > >> * .net cp 3.5 >> > >> * .net cp 4.0 >> > > >> > > [...] >> > > >> > >> So what if we announce EOL for all the other builds? We can still >> try to be >> > >> backwards compatible to ancient framework versions, but whoever >> needs a >> > >> binary for it should build it from source. >> > > >> > > That's fine with me, but I should be the last one to call the shots. >> > > >> > > Stefan >> > > > >
