[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15641314#comment-15641314
]
Joe commented on LOG4NET-256:
-----------------------------
I would suggest it could be resolved as "Cannot reproduce".
If the reporter doesn't agree, he can reopen with more information.
> log4net With MDC is not exactly threadsafe?
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LOG4NET-256
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-256
> Project: Log4net
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 1.2.10
> Environment: Windows Server 2003, Windows XP
> Reporter: MK Pandey
> Fix For: 1.2 Maintenance Release
>
> Attachments: bug detals mail.jpg
>
>
> Hi All,
> Our situation is that we are using MDC values (ex, transID) to set additional
> values which is used across multiple classes to identify the transaction.
> We have one LogHelper class which creates private static instance of the as
> below:
> log4net.ILog fileLogger = LogManager.GetLogger(GetType());
> When second thread starts and modifies the values, the subsequent logs from
> other threads start using the same values.
> Any suggestions?
> When using web.config file for appender defintion, is this not thread safe?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
