Hi Harry, sorry for the delay and many thanks for hanging around and nudging us. This is obviously something we need.
Harry has created a pull request that adds a feature of a ParallelAppender using TPL which, when enabled wraps all configured appenders and makes their logging asynchrounous. I've seen big overlap with Joe's work on an AsyncAppender and asked Harry to head over here for comments. I'm not really sure how the two approaches relate to each other and whether it would be a good idea to keep both of them in parallel or to merge them into one. My initial comment would be that I wouldn't want to enable parallel/async workflows unconditionally for all appenders but rather make people use the corresponding decorators explicitly when configuring their appenders. Stefan
