I think the primary reason is that there are still 24 open issues that haven't been resolved. If you like log4net and you don't feel comfortable writing patches either comment on the open issues or join the dev list and give feedback about what issues are important for a release and what issues are you think are more long term. Writing test cases (not many sample apppenders/layouts have them) would be helpful too.
--- Matthew Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any reason why 1.2.9 hasn't been given the "final" tag yet? > Seems to me like most people are using this beta9 release as if it > was > final anyway... > > On 12/5/05, Lansdaal, Michael T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > This version was labelled as v 1.2.0 beta 8 and is the latest > release for > > 1.2. My understanding is that the current effort is on 1.3 (to > support .NET > > 2.0). The 1.2.0 beta 8 software has been out for quite sometime > (over two > > years now I think) that I would have to consider it the defacto > released > > version. I have put it into production and it has worked > flawlessly for me. > > There have been frequent requests to release log4net, but that > just doesn't > > seem to be a priority with the developers. > > > > Thanks, Mike Lansdaal > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Ramaa Davanagere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 9:46 AM > > To: 'Log4NET User' > > Subject: RE: Log4net version 1.2.0.30714 > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, what is the last release version of log4net (non-beta > version)? > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ramaa Davanagere > > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 12:43 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Log4net version 1.2.0.30714 > > > > > > > > Is this a beta version? >
