> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christian Grobmeier [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, 27 April 2009 6:54 PM
> To: Log4PHP Dev
> Subject: Re: Getting rid of author tags:
> 
> OK. So we agree that contributions via patches become credits in svn
> commit messages and in the changes file.
> 
> What should we do with the currently existing authors?
> Most of the tags name Apache members, these are not a problem. But
> some of them came into code with the initial import. I don't have an
> idea what these authors really did and when.
> Is it enough to mention in changes.xml "Refactoring and clean up of
> code written by: x, y, z"

Hi Christian,

Lets hold off on this whilst we debate with Ceki.


> 
> Cheers,
> Christian
> 
> > Yep I agree, it is part of the 'Apache Way' if you like. Contributions
> such
> > as donated code (whether an initial import, a patch or a commit) belongs
> to
> > the project overall and not an individual. Any file
> > donated/committed/patched is owned by the project.
> >
> > Usually, patches are recognised by their authors in any number of ways -
> via
> > the Jira Issue Tracker, via an svn commit message "..fixes blah, due to
> Joe
> > Bloggs" .
> >
> > As far as an initial import, it is sometimes noted in a NOTICE file
> where it
> > came from and if it was a developer rather than another project then
> his/her
> > name is mentioned. I would not go as far as listing for instance 100
> > developers but rather the group(s) they belonged to. And I would not
> > continue to use a NOTICE file in this way.
> >
> > To give an example of Apache Forrest for instance uses a CHANGES file
> (per
> > version) to note significant contributions and who it came from. I think
> > this would be a better way forward than continuing to use the NOTICE
> file.
> >
> > We do not have to follow it but have a look at
> >
> > http://forrest.apache.org/guidelines.html#contribution
> >
> > and the generated CHANGES at
> >
> > http://forrest.apache.org/docs_0_90/changes.html
> >
> >
> > Gav...
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Christian
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> No virus found in this incoming message.
> >> Checked by AVG.
> >> Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.12.4/2081 - Release Date:
> 4/26/2009
> >> 9:44 AM
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.12.4/2081 - Release Date: 4/26/2009
> 9:44 AM

Reply via email to