Hi, > We can also get .txt or .xml versions. For now we can check the above page > to see how we are doing - it is regenerated and checks against any new code > after every commit so within a few minutes it's up to date.
RAT is great - we use it over at Commons too. > Sometime soon I can set it up so buildbot emails this list with any failed > RAT reports - can I have suggestions on frequency of this report, once a > week or once a month maybe - we can always check online at the above url in > the meantime. Assuming you want the report emailed at all, let me know. I think that would be great. I would say once a week. In the times of e-mail filters and short vacations most people should not be annoyed at all. > As you'll see from the above report, we have ONLY ONE file without an > appropriate License Header in the src code; that is excellent. I won't > bother opening an issue for that one file but will fix it up later. I will > spot check some other files but RAT is quite accurate these days. > hehehe this has mostly been done by the original developers :-) I think there are only one or two files I had to add the header :-) Good that we have such a tool now which forces us to keep up the good work of the former devs. Cheers Christian > > Enjoy > > Gav... > > >
