Hi

The hopefully last discussion about packaging issues :) But I fear the
incubator reviewer would bring them up anyway:

1. The source .tar.gz and .zip contain the site/coverage-report/
   directory. While including the generated phpdoc could be considered
   useful for people who just want to use log4php and not rebuild it,
   the coverage report seems pretty useless to me.

2. Should we distribute the apidocs alongside the .tar.gz even if
   they could be generated by the user using maven?

3. The package-config.php and package.php are not included in
   the .tar.gz and .zip. IIRC because they are not needed by the
   endusers but it just came to my mind that this means that the
   user cannot generate the phpdoc using "mvn site" as this would fail
   due to the missing files. Ok, maybe phpdoc is generated before the
   pear package, I don't remember, but it looks a bit unprofessional if
   we distribute the pom.xml but know that it will fail with errors, or?

4. The creation of the superfluous empty .jar will not annoy any of
   the reviewers, or? I have no idea how to turn it off and it would
   probably require an ant task to simply remove it.

bye,

-christian-

Reply via email to