On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Ivan Habunek <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2 January 2012 17:45, Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1 >> Sad but true. >> >> I just had a random thought. Not sure if it is true because I am not >> that hardcore user of git... >> but wouldn't it be very easy to maintain two branches of log4php, at >> least for a while? One with namespace one without > > If we wanted, we could do this. One option is to stop development on > the 5.2. branch and just develop the 5.3 branch. But that seems unfair > because a majority of people still use 5.2 and they wouldn't get all > the cool new stuff. :-) I would not like to develop features on both > branches simultaneously. That's just too much work IMHO. My proposal > is to wait another half-year or so and see what happens.
I agree, 5.2 is to widely spread (I couldn't use log4php myself if it would come with namespacing), but I thought the git wonder is something like: develop in branch a, push it to branch b, go. If this is not the case, then lets wait. Otherwise there is the git experiment running at the ASF. > I have moved the autoloader to LoggerAutoloader class in trunk. Looks > a bit nicer now. Thanks man > > Regards, > Ivan -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
