On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Christian grobmeier [via Apache Logging] < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 5:36 PM, businessdad > <[hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=34943&i=0>> > wrote: > > Fair enough. Let's hear what Ivan says (the guy who does coding mainly > these days) > > > About changing the Autoloader: I've done it already, together with > several > > other minor changes, but thanks for the suggestion. :) > > Hey, what about donating a patch to your favorite logging project? :-) > We are always eager to get improvements into our code base. If you > need help with that, let us know. > I would love to, but those changes were made to tailor Log4php for a specific use inside a framework, they would be of no use to general public. Apart from changing "include" to "require", that is, but that doesn't take much anyway. :) -- View this message in context: http://apache-logging.6191.n7.nabble.com/LoggerAutoloader-Why-include-and-not-require-tp34939p34944.html Sent from the Log4php - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
