Ceki Gulcu schrieb: > While the general archirecture is very similar, there are many differences. > See > > http://svn.qos.ch/repos/logback/trunk/logback-site/src/site/resources/logback.ppt > > for a short presentation on logback. (The presentation used to be called "Ten > reasons to switch to logback". thx > IMHO, the higher activity seen in logback > compared to log4j may be your most important reason to switch. > the main reason why I was asking about the real differences:
I made my decision to use SLF4J as API and to use LOGBack as implementation. ...runs all inside OSGI Enterprise (client/server) application based on: Eclipse Equinox, Eclipse Riena, Easybeans / Hibernate etc. so I'm using bundles with the bridges between slf4j and log4j, jcl, jul and also wrote my osgi-over-slf4j bundle as bridge between OSGI log services, OSGI framework events, OSGI bundle events... all works well ...but there was a question in my blog why I'm not using PAX-Logging as bridge to other legacy logging frameworks. but PAX Logging uses Log4J as implementation and I'm working on my next blog entries and wanted to provide a matrix to compare features of log4j and logback ekke _______________________________________________ Logback-user mailing list [email protected] http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-user
