On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Ceki Gulcu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello all, > > After a very long investigation resulting in a better understanding of > licensing issues, I think dual-licensing logback under EPL 1.0 and > LGPL 2.1 would help with the project's adoption. > > Licensees can then choose either the terms of the EPL or the terms of > the LGPL when they use logback. The EPL license will placate > organizations which refuse the restrictions imposed by the LGPL > whereas the LGPL license ensures continuity in licensing and also > keeps the door open for licensees already bound by the terms of > (L)GPL. > > Comments? > > ps. If you intend to respond, please do so on logback-us...@. > > -- > Ceki Gülcü > Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for > Java. > http://logback.qos.ch > _______________________________________________ > Logback-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-user >
I agree that this would be a positive move. -- Stephen Duncan Jr www.stephenduncanjr.com
_______________________________________________ Logback-user mailing list [email protected] http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-user
