also sprach Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.02.13.0042 +0100]: > >I see no reason why /etc/logcheck should have any more permissions > >than 0750. Please consider removing access rights from 'other'. > > Conversely, I don't see much point in being this restrictive?
For a fact, some packages install 644 files: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/logcheck# ls -la ignore.d.server/ntp-server -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 45 Aug 26 10:30 ignore.d.server/ntp-server By making /etc/logcheck 750, those could be protected, and it would be unnecessary to file bugs against all packages installing 644 logcheck files. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP (sub)keys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! "it would be truly surprising if sound were not capable of suggesting colour, if colours could not give the idea of the melody, if sound and colour were not adequate to express ideas." -- claude debussy
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
_______________________________________________ Logcheck-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/logcheck-devel
