E o que acham os colegas de "L'être et l'événement" (1988), de Alain Badiou?
Da Wikipedia anglófona: "His philosophy draws upon both 'analytical' and 'continental' traditions. In Badiou's own opinion, this combination places him awkwardly relative to his contemporaries, meaning that his work had been only slowly taken up. Being and Event offers an example of this slow uptake, in fact: it was translated into English only in 2005, a full seventeen years after its French publication. As is implied in the title of the book, two elements mark the thesis of Being and Event: the place of ontology, or 'the science of being qua being' (being in itself), and the place of the event – which is seen as a rupture in being – through which the subject finds realization and reconciliation with truth. This situation of being and the rupture which characterizes the event are thought in terms of set theory, and specifically Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory (with the axiom of choice), to which Badiou accords a fundamental role in a manner quite distinct from the majority of either mathematicians or philosophers." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alain_Badiou#Introduction_to_Being_and_Event A tradução no Brasil saiu em 1996. (Na época em que olhei para ela, no estande da editora numa ANPOF longínqua, não entendi rigorosamente *nada*. Mas me apressei a pôr a culpa no tradutor e nos meus parcos conhecimentos de teoria de conjuntos.) JM _______________________________________________ Logica-l mailing list Logica-l@dimap.ufrn.br http://www.dimap.ufrn.br/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/logica-l
