---------- Forwarded message ----------

============================================================================================
The Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science of Ghent University was
founded in 1993. On occasion of its 20th anniversary the Centre
organises an international Conference on Logic and Philosophy of
Science (CLPS13) on the themes that are central to its research:

- Logical analysis of scientific reasoning processes
- Methodological and epistemological analysis of scientific reasoning processes

Conference dates: 16-18 September 2013

Keynote talks will be given by Diderik Batens (the founder of the
Centre), three logicians (Natacha Alechina, Graham Priest and Stephen
Read) and three philosophers of science (Hanne Andersen, Hasok Chang,
and Jim Woodward).

We will also schedule parallel sessions with contributed papers and
special symposia with a limited number of papers. I organise a
symposium entitled 'Solving/handling/avoiding paradoxes by means of
non-classical logics' (symposium #11).

Description of the symposium:

This symposium aims at novel and original approaches to solve, handle
or avoid a particular kind of paradoxes by means of non-classical
logics. The kind of paradoxes considered here cause intuitively sound
and valuable principles to trivialize when combined with classical
logic. The naive truth schema, the full comprehension schema and the
principle of tolerance for vague predicates are typical examples of
such intuitively valuable principles. It is generally known that, in a
classical logic setting, these principles lead to several disastrous
paradoxes such as the Russell, Curry, Liar and sorites paradoxes.
There are two ways to solve these paradoxical problems. Either one
revises the intuitive principles involved or one revises the logical
machinery. Here we investigate the second option. Nowadays,
non-classical logic has become a  fully developed discipline with many
well-established and philosophically well-motivated formal techniques
in different directions (paraconsistent, paracomplete, fuzzy,
relevant, substructural, non-monotonic and many other logics). With
this toolbox at hand, one can start an open minded search for sensible
logical solutions to either avoid, handle or solve the paradoxes and
thus provide new philosophical perspectives on those topics that are
susceptible to paradoxes.

If you want to present a paper at this symposium, please upload an
abstract in PDF format (between 500 and 1000 words) to:
https://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=clps13 before 1 April
2013. You will be asked to choose between one of the following
submission categories:

- Logical analysis of scientific reasoning processes
- Methodological and epistemological analysis of scientific reasoning processes
- Symposium submission

Select the last option and mention the symposium number in the title
of your abstract. If you do not have an EasyChair account you can
create one here: https://www.easychair.org/account/signup.cgi.

Unfortunately, we cannot offer any financial support for symposium
speakers. Neither can we waive the registration fee. All abstracts for
symposia will be refereed by the organisers and other members of the
programme committee. Notification of acceptance will be given by 15
May 2013.

All further information (e.g. accommodation, registration, maps) can
be found at the conference website: http://www.clps13.ugent.be/.

The programme will be available on the website by 1 July 2013.

============================================================================================
_______________________________________________
Logica-l mailing list
Logica-l@dimap.ufrn.br
http://www.dimap.ufrn.br/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/logica-l

Responder a